How the Asante Kingdom started.

The article talks about how the Asantes became dominant and popular in Ghana (Gold Coast), and also how the Asante Kingdom started.

The Early Asantes

Asantes fleeing Denkyira’s hegemony, many smaller Akan tribes moved eastward and settled around the city of Kumasi. By the late 17th century, these Akan peoples were drawn together and were ruled by a single leader, called the Kumasehene. Eventually, the Kumasehene became the Asantehene, and the Asante saw themselves as a single, united people. Obiri Yeboa was the first prominent Kumasehene, and he enlarged the power of his Oyoko clan (yeboa) by incorporating other local Akan nobility into his family, through a combination of force and diplomacy.

How the Asante Kingdom started

The Reign of Osei Tutu and the Golden Stool

Osei Tutu (1680-1717) was the first king of Kumasi to claim the title Asantehene. He would lead the people of Asante and Kumasi to become the dominant power of the Gold Coast. Osei Tutu had the vision and statesmanship to transform the Asante from a subordinate vassal of Denkirya to the paramount Akan kingdom. Osei Tutu had spent some time as a resident prince of the Akwamu court, learned of their military tactics, and was able to ally with that tribe. With the support of the Akwamu king, Osei Tutu revolted against Denkyira. In battle, the Asante developed a pincher formation that aimed to flank the enemy force from the sides and rear. The revolt met with success.

In 1698, the favourite wife of Osei was sent to negotiate at the Denkyira court as a sign of goodwill; instead of receiving her honourably, the enemy king raped her. After that, the war between the two kingdoms became much more savage. At the Battle of Feyiase (1701), the Asante triumphed decisively over Denkyira, bringing total victory. The Denkyirahene was killed, and that nation would persist only as a shadow of its former self. The Asante Empire was now the dominant Akan kingdom, and soon monopolised trade in the Gold Coast region.  Osei used a consultative body of the Kotoko Council to integrate the leadership of new peoples into the Asante State. As the empire expanded, incorporated peoples were allowed to join the Asante union directly or exist as semi-autonomous client states. With Osei Tutu began the tradition of the Golden Stool, a gold-glad ceremonial chair which was the physical embodiment of the entire Asante nation. It was an ancient Akan custom for each family to have a stool signifying the authority of elders, as well as stools indicating a chief’s authority in each tribe. The Golden Stool developed a spiritual and political significance beyond all proportion of this earlier tradition, and was said to have a miraculous origin. It was so sacred that even the Asantehene could not sit on it. 

The chief priest and spiritual leader of the Asante, Okomfo Anokye, was believed to have called the golden stool down from heaven. The stool houses the soul of the Asante nation and is believed to connect all Asante individuals- those dead, those living, and those yet to be born. As a political symbol, the Golden Stool was seen to transcend the power of all other stools in the Akan tradition. As Akan tribes were absorbed into the Asante union, they were made to bury their stools in a sign of deference.

The Silent Cost of Unemployment: Beyond the Paycheck

Unemployment is often measured in numbers, but its true impact stretches far beyond economic statistics. This article explores the hidden psychological, social, and structural consequences of joblessness, especially in developing economies, and argues for a more holistic approach to policy

Unemployment is typically framed as a loss of income, but its ripple effects extend deep into the fabric of society. In regions like sub-Saharan Africa, where informal economies dominate and social safety nets are thin, joblessness can trigger a cascade of personal and communal challenges.

Psychologically, prolonged unemployment erodes self-worth and identity. Work is not just a means of survival—it’s a source of structure, purpose, and social connection. Without it, individuals often experience anxiety, depression, and a sense of isolation. These effects are amplified in cultures where employment is tied to social status or familial responsibility.

Socially, unemployment can destabilize communities. Young adults without work are more vulnerable to exploitation, crime, or migration pressures. Families may fracture under financial strain, and local economies suffer as purchasing power declines. The result is a feedback loop where poverty and unemployment reinforce each other.

Structurally, the absence of inclusive labor policies and vocational training programs leaves many trapped in cycles of underemployment or informal work. Governments often focus on macroeconomic growth without addressing the mismatch between education and market demand.

To truly address unemployment, interventions must go beyond job creation. Mental health support, skills retraining, and community-based initiatives are essential. A paycheck solves one problem—but restoring dignity, purpose, and opportunity solves many.

The History of the Internet: From Military Project to Global Network

The Internet, a transformative force in modern life, began as a military research project in the late 1960s. Originally known as ARPANET, it was developed by the U.S. Department of Defense to enable secure communication between computers across

The History of the Internet: From Military Project to Global Network

The internet has become an indispensable part of modern life. From sending emails to streaming movies, shopping online to accessing world news in real-time, the internet connects billions of people across the globe. But how did it all begin? The history of the internet is a fascinating journey that spans decades of technological innovation, government collaboration, and private enterprise.

The history of the internet 

Origins in the Cold War

The story of the internet begins in the late 1950s, in the midst of the Cold War. After the Soviet Union launched Sputnik in 1957, the U.S. government felt an urgent need to invest in science and technology. This led to the creation of the Advanced Research Projects Agency (ARPA) in 1958, a branch of the U.S. Department of Defense [1].

In the 1960s, ARPA began developing a way for military and research computers to communicate even if parts of the system were destroyed in a nuclear attack. The result was ARPANET, launched in 1969. It connected four universities—UCLA, Stanford, UC Santa Barbara, and the University of Utah—and allowed them to share data and research [2].

The Birth of Networking

ARPANET introduced a revolutionary idea: packet switching. Unlike traditional telephone lines, which require a dedicated circuit between callers, packet switching breaks data into small "packets" that travel independently and reassemble at the destination. This made communication faster, more efficient, and resilient to failure.

By the 1970s, more institutions joined ARPANET, forming a growing network of computers. Researchers Vinton Cerf and Robert Kahn developed a communication protocol called TCP/IP (Transmission Control Protocol/Internet Protocol) in 1974, which allowed different networks to connect seamlessly [3]. TCP/IP became the foundation for what we now call the internet.

Going Public

In the 1980s, the internet began to expand beyond government and academic institutions. In 1983, the ARPANET officially adopted TCP/IP, and the Domain Name System (DNS) was introduced, making it easier to identify websites through names (like “www.example.com”) instead of numeric IP addresses [4].

By the late 1980s, private companies and universities started building their own networks. In 1990, ARPANET was officially decommissioned, having served its purpose as the prototype for the global internet.

The World Wide Web

While the internet provided the infrastructure for global communication, it was the World Wide Web, invented in 1989 by British computer scientist Tim Berners-Lee, that made the internet accessible to the average person [5]. Berners-Lee created the first web browser and web server, and in 1991, the first website went live.

The web allowed users to navigate through links and pages using a graphical interface. Suddenly, the internet was no longer just for scientists and researchers—it was for everyone.

The Dot-Com Boom and Beyond

In the mid-1990s, the internet rapidly commercialized. Companies launched websites, search engines like Yahoo! and Google emerged, and the era of dot-com startups began. By the year 2000, millions of people had internet access in their homes.

Despite the crash of many internet startups in the dot-com bust of 2000–2001, the internet continued to grow. Broadband replaced dial-up, smartphones brought the web to our pockets, and platforms like Facebook, YouTube, and Amazon revolutionized how we communicate, consume content, and shop.

Today’s Internet

As of 2025, the internet connects more than 5 billion people worldwide [6]. It has transformed every aspect of life—education, healthcare, politics, entertainment, and work. Technologies like cloud computing, social media, artificial intelligence, and the Internet of Things (IoT) have expanded its capabilities in ways early pioneers could hardly have imagined. Yet the internet also brings challenges: digital privacy concerns, misinformation, cybersecurity threats, and the digital divide between those with and without access.

Conclusion

The internet began as a military project designed to withstand nuclear attacks and evolved into the most powerful communication tool in human history. Its development was driven by visionaries, engineers, and researchers who believed in the power of connecting people. As we look to the future—with innovations like 6G, quantum computing, and decentralized networks—the internet’s story is still being written.

How ghana country was discovery

Anything to know about Ghana and its historical facts.
In the early days, the country Ghana was called "GOLD COAST", which was before colonialism in West Africa.

The area of the Republic of Ghana (the then Gold Coast) became known in Europe and Arabia as the Ghana Empire after the title of its Emperor, the Ghana. 

Geographically, the ancient Ghana Empire was approximately 500 miles (800 km) north and west of the modern state of Ghana, and controlled territories in the area of the Senegal River and eastward towards the Niger River, in modern Senegal, Mauritania. A reduced kingdom continued to exist after the Almoravid rule ended, and it was later incorporated into subsequent Sahelian empires such as the Mali Empire.

 Around the same time, south of the Mali empire in present-day northern Ghana, the Kingdom of Dagbon emerged. The decentralised states ruled by the tindaamba were unified into a kingdom. Many sub-kingdoms would later arise from Dagbon, including the Mossi Kingdoms of Burkina Faso and the Bouna Kingdom of the Ivory Coast.

 Dagbon pioneered Ghana's earliest learning institutions, including a university town and a writing system, before European arrival.
Toward the end of the classical era, larger regional kingdoms had formed in West Africa, one of which was the Kingdom of Ghana, north of what is today the nation of Ghana. 

Before its fall at the beginning of the 10th century, Akans migrated southward and founded several nation-states around their matriclans, including the first empire of the Bono State, founded in the 11th century and for which the Brong Ahafo (Bono Ahafo) region is named. The Mole Dagbon people, who founded the earliest centralised political kingdoms of Ghana, migrated from Lake Chad to present-day Ghana. Later, Akan ethnic groups such as the Ashanti, Akyem, Akwamu, Fante state and others are thought to possibly have roots in the original Bono State settlement at Bono Manso. 

The Ashanti kingdom's government operated first as a loose network and eventually as a centralised empire-kingdom with an advanced, highly specialised bureaucracy centred on the capital Kumasi.

By the end of the 16th century, most of the ethnic groups constituting the modern Ghanaian population had settled in their present locations. Archaeological remains found in the coastal zone indicated that the area had been inhabited since the Bronze Age (ca. 2000 BC), but these societies, based on fishing, had left few traces.

 Archaeological work also suggests that central Ghana, north of the forest zone, was inhabited as early as 3,000 to 4,000 years ago.
These migrations resulted in part from the formation and disintegration of a series of large states in the western Sudan (the region north of modern Ghana drained by the Niger River). 

Strictly speaking, Ghana was the title of the king, but the Arabs, who left records of the kingdom, applied the term to the King, the capital, and the state. The 9th-century Berber historian and geographer AI Yaqubi described ancient Ghana as one of the three most organised states in the region. Its rulers were renowned for their wealth in gold, the opulence of their courts, and their warrior/hunting skills. 

They were also masters of the trade in gold, which drew North African merchants to the western Sudan. To be continued.

Who can resolve the Gaza war? Let's talk

The Gaza War is a complex conflict

1. Historical context: Gaza Strip has been contentious since Israel's withdrawal in 2005.
2. Causes: Both sides claim self-defense, with Israel citing rocket attacks and Hamas citing blockade and occupation.
3. Humanitarian crisis:
*The Gaza War: A Complex and Contested Conflict*

The Gaza war 

The Gaza War refers to a series of conflicts between Israel and Palestinian militant groups, particularly Hamas, in the Gaza Strip. The war has resulted in significant humanitarian crises, loss of life, and widespread destruction. To understand the complexity of the issue, it's essential to examine the historical context, causes, and consequences of the conflict.

*Historical Background*

The Gaza Strip has been a contentious issue since the Israeli withdrawal in 2005. Hamas, which won the Palestinian legislative elections in 2006, has controlled Gaza since 2007. Israel and Egypt have maintained a blockade on Gaza, citing security concerns. The blockade has severely impacted the Gaza economy and humanitarian situation.

*Causes of the War*

The conflict is deeply complex, with both sides claiming self-defense. Israel argues that Hamas' rocket attacks and tunnel diggings pose a significant threat, while Hamas claims Israel's blockade and occupation are unacceptable. The situation is further complicated by the Israeli settlements in the West Bank and the displacement of Palestinians.

*Humanitarian Crisis*

The war has led to a severe humanitarian crisis, with thousands of civilian casualties, widespread destruction of infrastructure, and a dire need for humanitarian aid. The United Nations has repeatedly expressed concern over the humanitarian situation, citing the need for unrestricted access to Gaza.

*International Response*

The international community has been divided on the issue, with some countries supporting Israel's right to self-defense and others condemning the blockade and occupation. The United States has historically been a strong ally of Israel, while many European countries have called for a more balanced approach.

*Prospects for Peace*

A lasting resolution to the conflict remains elusive. Efforts to negotiate a ceasefire and restart peace talks have been challenging, with both sides having deeply entrenched positions. The issue is further complicated by internal divisions within both Israel and Palestine.

*Challenges to a Two-State Solution*

A two-state solution, which would involve Israel and Palestine existing side by side, has been the widely accepted framework for peace negotiations. However, the expansion of Israeli settlements and the division within Palestine have made this solution increasingly challenging.

*Human Rights Concerns*

Both sides have been accused of human rights violations, with Israel facing criticism for its use of force and blockade, and Hamas facing accusations of using civilians as human shields and launching rockets into civilian areas.

*Economic Impact*

The conflict has had a significant economic impact on both Israel and Gaza. The Gaza economy has been severely impacted by the blockade, while Israel has faced economic costs due to military operations and security measures.

*Conclusion*

The Gaza War is a complex and multifaceted conflict, with deep historical, political, and humanitarian dimensions. A sustainable solution will require addressing the root causes of the conflict, including the blockade, occupation, and security concerns. The international community must work towards a unified approach to address the humanitarian crisis and promote a lasting peace.

To move forward, it's essential to consider the following:

1. *Ceasefire agreements*: Negotiating and maintaining ceasefire agreements can help reduce violence and create an environment conducive to peace talks.


2. *Humanitarian access*: Ensuring unrestricted humanitarian access to Gaza can help alleviate the humanitarian crisis and improve living conditions.

3. *Addressing root causes*: Addressing the root causes of the conflict, including the blockade and occupation, is crucial to achieving a lasting peace.

4. *International cooperation*: A unified international approach can help promote a peaceful resolution and address the humanitarian crisis.

Ultimately, a lasting peace in Gaza will require a comprehensive and inclusive solution that addresses the complex historical, political, and humanitarian dimensions of the conflict.

The history of slave trade read on this blog is well explained

The trans-Atlantic slave trade, which began in the 15th century, involved the forced transportation of millions of Africans to the Americas by European powers.

 The trade devastated African societies, destabilized their economies, and profoundly impacted the continent's development for
The enslavement of people has been a part of human history for centuries. Slavery and human bondage has taken many forms, including enslaving people as prisoners of war or due to their beliefs, but the permanent, hereditary enslavement based on race later adopted in the U.S. was rare before the 15th century.

The history of slave trade

Many attributes of slavery began to change when European settlers intent on colonizing the Americas used violence and military power to compel forced labor from enslaved people. Indigenous people became the first victims of forced labor and enslavement at the hands of Europeans in the Americas.

 However, millions of Indigenous people died from disease, famine, war, and harsh labor conditions in the decades that followed.

Committed to extracting profit from their colonies in the Americas, European powers turned to the African continent. To meet their ever-growing need for labor, they initiated a massive global undertaking that relied on abduction, human trafficking, and racializing enslavement at a scale without precedent in human history. Never before had millions of people been kidnapped and trafficked over such a great distance.
The European Influence on Africa.

Europe had no contact with Sub-Saharan Africa before the Portuguese, seeking wealth and gold, sailed down the western coast of Africa and reached the Gold Coast (modern-day Ghana) in 1471. Initially focused on obtaining gold, Portugal established trading relationships and built El Mina Fort to protect its interests in the gold trade.

Over the following decades, the Spanish, English, French, Dutch, Danish, and Swedes began to make contact with Sub-Saharan Africa as well. Portugal soon converted El Mina into a prison for holding kidnapped Africans, and European traffickers built castles, barracoons, and forts on the African coast to support the forced enslavement of abducted Africans.

German and Italian merchants and bankers who did not personally traffic kidnapped Africans nonetheless provided essential funding and insurance to develop the Transatlantic Slave Trade and plantation economy. Italian merchants were essential in the effort to extend the sugar plantation system to the Atlantic Islands off the west coast of Africa, like São Tomé, and financial capital from Genoa was instrumental in expanding Portugal’s ability to traffic Africans.

By the 1600s, every major European power had established trading relationships with Sub-Saharan Africa and was participating in the transportation of kidnapped Africans to the Americas in some way. During this time period, several thousand Africans were kidnapped and trafficked to mainland Europe and the Americas, but the volume of human trafficking soon escalated to horrific proportions.

Led again by the Portuguese, European powers began to occupy the Americas in the 1500s. In the 16th and 17th centuries, using land stolen from Indigenous populations in the Americas, Europeans established plantations that relied on enslaved labor to mass produce goods (primarily sugar cane) for trading and sale. The cultivation of sugar for mass consumption became a driving force in the growing trafficking of human beings from Africa.

Europeans initially relied on Indigenous people to supply this labor. But mass killings and disease decimated Indigenous populations in what historian David Brion Davis called “the greatest known population loss in human history.”

The Indigenous population in Mexico plummeted by nearly 90% in 75 years. In Hispaniola (modern-day Haiti and Dominican Republic), the population of Arawak and Taino people fell from between 300,000 and 500,000 in 1492 to fewer than 500 people by 1542, just five decades later. Without Indigenous workers, plantation owners in the Americas grew desperate for a new source of exploited labor.


Driven by the desire for wealth, these European powers shifted from acquiring gold and other goods in Sub-Saharan Africa to trafficking in human beings. Over the following centuries, Europeans demanded that millions of Africans be trafficked to work on plantations and in other businesses in the Americas.

Slavery had existed in Africa prior to this point, but this new commodification of human beings by European powers was entirely unique and it drastically changed the African concept of enslavement
Although some African officials and merchants acquired wealth through the export of millions of people, the Transatlantic Slave Trade devastated and de-stabilized societies and economies across Africa. The scale of disruption and violence contributed to long-term conflict and violence on the continent while European powers were able to amass massive financial benefits and global power from this dehumanizing trade.

The Iberian powers of Spain and Portugal and their colonies in Uruguay and Brazil were responsible for trafficking 99% of the nearly 630,000 kidnapped Africans trafficked from 1501 to 1625. Over the next 240 years, England, France, the Netherlands, Scandinavia, the Baltic States, and their colonies joined the Iberians in actively trafficking Africans. Almost 12 million kidnapped Africans were trafficked from 1625 to 1867. Ships from Portugal and its colony Brazil alone were responsible for trafficking 5,849,300 kidnapped Africans during this time period.

Ships originating in Great Britain were responsible for trafficking more than a quarter of all people taken from Africa from 1501 to 1867. From 1726 to 1800, British ships were the leading traffickers of kidnapped Africans, responsible for taking more than two million people from Africa.

From 1626 to 1867, ships from North America were responsible for trafficking at least 305,000 captured people from Africa. In the two years before the U.S. legally ended the international slave trade in 1808, a quarter of all trafficked Africans were carried in ships that flew the U.S. flag. Rhode Island’s ports combined to organize voyages responsible for trafficking at least 111,000 kidnapped Africans, making it one of the 15 largest originating ports in the world.

Join hot discussion why africa should still depend on foreign aids?

Why should some of the African countries still depend on foreign aid for development? Africa must have its freedom.


Africa Must Have Its Freedom

For centuries, Europeans dominated the African continent. The white man arrogated to
himself the right to rule and to be obeyed by the British. His mission, he claimed, was to
“civilise” Africa. Under this chaos, the Europeans robbed the continent of vast riches and inflicted
unimaginable suffering on the African people.
All this makes a sad story, but now we must be prepared to bury the past with its unpleasant
memories and look to the future. All we ask of the former colonial powers is their goodwill and co
operation to remedy past mistakes and injustices, and to grant independence to the colonies in
Africa.

It is clear that we must find an African solution to our problems, and that this can only be
found in African unity. Divided, we are weak; united, Africa could become one of the greatest forces
for good in the world.
Although most Africans are poor, our continent has the potential to be extremely rich. Our mineral
resources, which are being exploited with foreign capital only to enrich foreign investors, range
from gold and diamonds to uranium and petroleum. Our forests contain some of the finest woods to
be grown anywhere. Our cash crops include cocoa, coffee, rubber, tobacco and cotton. As for
power, which is an important factor in any economic development, Africa contains over 40% of the
potential water power of the world, as compared with about 10% in Europe and 13% in North
America. Yet so far, less than 1% has been developed.

This is one of the reasons why we have in Africa, the paradox of poverty in the midst of plenty, and scarcity in the midst of abundance. Never before have people had within their grasp so great an opportunity for developing a continent endowed with so much wealth. Individually, the independent states of Africa, some of them potentially rich, others poor, can do little for their people. Together, by mutual help, they can
achieve much. But the economic development of the continent must be planned and pursued as a
whole.

A loose confederation designed only for economic co-operation would not provide the
necessary unity of purpose. Only a strong political union can bring about full and effective
development of our natural resources for the benefit of our people.

The political situation in Africa today is heartening and at the same time disturbing. It is
heartening to see so many new flags hoisted in place of the old; it is disturbing to see so many
countries of varying sizes and at different levels of development, weak and, in some cases, almost
helpless. If this terrible state of fragmentation is allowed to continue, it may well be disastrous for us
all.

There are at present some 28 states in Africa, excluding the Union of South Africa, and
those countries not yet free. No less than nine of these states have a population of less than three
million. Can we seriously believe that the colonial powers meant these countries to be independent,
viable states? The example of South America, which has as much wealth, if not more than North
America, and yet remains weak and dependent on outside interests, is one that every African
would do well to study. Critics of African unity often refer to the wide differences in culture, language and ideas in various parts of Africa. This is true, but the essential fact remains that we are all Africans and have
a common interest in the independence of Africa.